2023 NYSBOE campaign-finance records
Contribution-by-recipient and contributor extracts used for the exact rows and comparison above.
Open NYSBOE reporting system Learn
A source-led review · Inspiration Wharf
How the Inspiration Wharf record unfolded, 2023–2026.
Campaign filings, project materials, Town emails, the zoning draft, the hearing record, and the later application show what happened in sequence. Open the source pages as you read.
The question
What happened first—and what can the documents connect?
The sequence begins with reported campaign contributions in 2023, moves through project materials and a Town calendar record in 2024, reaches Planning’s January 2025 description of the zoning draft, and ends with the formal application and approvals in 2026. The dates matter because the 2024 concept, 2025 code amendment, and 2026 application are related records—but not interchangeable documents.
The chronology
Each step carries its source.
Campaign records show reported contributions.
The preserved New York State Board of Elections extracts show seven 2023 rows that matter to this chronology: contributions to Friends of Mariann Dalimonte from Kathleen Deegan-Dickson, New Suburbia PAC, Gennaro Sbarro, Stephanie Micucci, and Crowe Deegan LLP, plus a contribution from Louie’s Restaurant Operating LLC to a DeSena committee. The table reproduces the reported addresses exactly. It identifies what the filings report; it does not supply a reason for any contribution.
Public campaign-finance recordThe project team dated a concept before the zoning draft.
A five-page zoning-analysis PDF dated September 24, 2024 describes two schemes for 401–415 Main Street. Its program summary described a 44-unit, 106,000-square-foot combined-lot scheme with storage. The document shows what project planning materials existed at that date; it is not a Town approval or a formal Town application.
Applicant project materialA Town calendar scheduled a project meeting.
A produced October 23 calendar email scheduled a meeting for October 30 from 10–11 a.m. in the Supervisor’s office and listed Gennaro Sbarro, Gianni Sbarro, and Kathleen Deegan Dickson as attendees. The preserved calendar record does not include an agenda, notes, follow-up, or independent proof of attendance.
Town-produced calendar recordPlanning questions prompted a project-program clarification.
A produced email chain records a question about a zoning-analysis program sheet after communication with Planning. The architect clarified that the upper floors of the commercial buildings were intended as storage. That matters because it shows the concept was still being explained and refined before Planning sent the January draft. It does not show that Planning approved the concept or that the October meeting produced the draft.
Town-produced project-material exchangeDalimonte described how she requested and reviewed changes.
In February 4 writings, Dalimonte said potential buyers had met with the Supervisor about amendments they wanted and that residents had proposed amendments and clarifications. Her newsletter says she requested a joint Planning meeting, received a draft on January 24, gave it to the B-W Steering Committee on January 25, met with the committee on January 29, and requested modifications. Those writings establish her account of those actions; they do not identify every participant in an earlier conversation.
Dalimonte email and newsletterPlanning sent the Board a draft tied to a preliminary proposal.
Planning Commissioner Nancy Shahverdi’s transmittal says the B-W amendments were developed from the preliminary Inspiration Wharf proposal and the developer’s draft amendments, while also describing a balancing exercise involving the original code, residents’ concerns, and economic-development goals. This email is the clearest primary-record statement about the draft’s stated provenance.
Planning Department emailResidents challenged the 10 a.m. hearing schedule.
The Town scheduled the amendment hearing for February 11 at 10 a.m. On February 3, Alice Chong asked DeSena and Dalimonte to adjourn it because of the weekday-morning time and limited review period. Dalimonte’s February 4 reply says she opposed the bifurcated calendar because it made participation harder for working residents. The record therefore supports this narrow point: Dalimonte said she objected to the schedule. It does not support saying she chose the 10 a.m. time.
Resident request and Dalimonte replyThe Town Board adopted the B-W amendments.
The preserved hearing record shows the Town Board adopted Local Law 3-2025, including the Waterfront Business District amendments. That adoption set the code used for later review. It did not approve the 2024 concept materials or the later Inspiration Wharf application.
Town hearing recordThe formal application entered review under B-W.
The January 2026 environmental and intake materials identify the site as B-W, list a special-use permit, and state that no zoning change was requested. That is the formal application path described in the 2026 record. It does not establish that every 2024 concept detail carried into the application.
Applicant environmental and intake recordThe applicant added environmental and site-plan materials.
May filings asked to amend the Brownfield Cleanup Agreement record to add five former lots to the parcel grouping. The June plan set showed the project layout then under review. These records show what the applicant submitted before the July hearing; they do not by themselves establish DEC’s final disposition or the legal effect of a parcel grouping.
Applicant and agency recordsThe Town Board adopted the project resolutions.
The July 14 hearing record places the Inspiration Wharf votes on that date and records a public-seating condition added to both resolutions. Resolution 358-2026 contains the written condition requiring public seating within the rear public open space. The final numbered resolution is preserved, but the source controls do not treat it as Clerk-certified or filing-date stamped.
Town hearing record and resolution textThe Town posted the decision records.
The Town portal record for the July 14 meeting lists minutes and meeting media, while the controlled source set preserves final numbered Resolutions 358-2026 and 359-2026. Publication makes the decision text reviewable. It does not, by itself, prove Clerk acceptance, certification, or a filing date.
Town portal and preserved source controls
What the sequence shows
The dates separate the records.
- Project materials existed by September 2024.
- Planning’s January 23 email tied the B-W draft to a preliminary Inspiration Wharf proposal and draft amendments.
- The Board adopted the B-W amendments in February 2025 before the formal 2026 application entered review.
- The July 2026 resolutions contain a written public-seating condition.
Questions still open
What the records do not answer.
- What was said at the October 30, 2024 meeting, and who attended?
- Were the 2024 potential buyers the same legal entity later identified as Manhasset Bay Real Estate LLC?
- Which person or group first requested particular amendment language?
- What filing or certification evidence exists for the July 2026 resolutions?
Why this matters
A contribution, a draft, and an approval are different records.
The filings show financial relationships. The Planning email describes the source of a draft. The 2026 resolution sets a condition. The public can evaluate those facts without claiming that any one document proves an unstated motive or agreement.
Documents behind this page
Open the public sources and identify the controlled records.
September 2024 project concept
The actual source pages appear in the chronology, including the dated cover.
Source copies held by SOS PWOctober and December 2024 emails
The chronology states what the produced records show. Privileged or confidential message bodies are not published as screenshots.
Native sources held by SOS PWPlanning draft and February hearing
The draft page and preserved minutes appear inline with the relevant dates.
Source copies held by SOS PW2026 application and approval
The FEAF, site plan, and resolution condition pages appear inline with the 2026 entries.
Source copies and controls held by SOS PWWaterfront Business District code
Read the code itself before accepting a summary of what changed.
Open the Town codeTown meeting record and media
Use the Town portal for the meeting record and posted media.
Open the Town portalSource previews are page images from the preserved records. They are provided for inspection; native email files and controlled source packages are not downloadable from this page.